Skip to topic guide
Degrees of SatoshiFollow the connections.
Degrees of Satoshi/ Correspondence

Correspondence topic guide · Edition 1.0.0

Double spending & consensus

A compact reading path through the archive’s double-spending records and the design questions that surround confirmation, ordering and competing histories.

What this guide includes.

This guide uses the archive’s exact double-spending tag. “Consensus” is an editorial description of the surrounding research question, not an additional dataset label or a claim that the historical vocabulary matches current terminology.

Limit: A tagged record can discuss a threat, example or implementation detail without supplying a complete consensus specification. Read the linked source in context before citing it.

The shape of this source set.

Counts describe indexed records, not distinct claims or unique ideas. Cross-posts, reply threads and multi-tag records can overlap.

Records by year

  1. 7
  2. 6
  3. 15

Records by venue

VenueRecordsShare
BitcoinTalk1553.6%
Cryptography list828.6%
P2P Research list310.7%
bitcoin-list13.6%
P2P Foundation13.6%

Matching tag counts

  • double spending28100.0% of this guide

Tag counts can sum above the 28 unique records in this guide.

Three questions to carry into the sources.

These prompts organize close reading. They are not quotations or claims attributed to Satoshi.

  1. 01

    Threat model

    Begin with the 2008 mailing-list exchanges to locate double spending within the objections raised against the proposed system.

  2. 02

    Confirmations and ordering

    Trace how later records connect transaction confidence to competing chains and accumulated proof of work.

  3. 03

    Vocabulary over time

    Keep the archive’s source-era wording distinct from later consensus terminology and modern implementation assumptions.

Ten coordinates across the record.

The generator removes repeated normalized subjects, then selects an even chronological spread. It is a reproducible orientation set—not a ranking of importance or a random sample.

  1. 01

    · Cryptography list

    Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper

    double spending
  2. 02

    · bitcoin-list

    [bitcoin-list] Bitcoin v0.1 Alpha release notes

    double spending
  3. 03

    · P2P Research list

    [p2p-research] Bitcoin P2P e-currency v0.1 released

    double spending
  4. 04

    · BitcoinTalk

    Re: Bitcoin snack machine (fast transaction problem)

    double spending
  5. 05

    · BitcoinTalk

    Re: Bitcoin minting is thermodynamically perverse

    double spending
  6. 06

    · BitcoinTalk

    Version 0.3.10 - block 74638 overflow PATCH!

    double spending
  7. 07

    · BitcoinTalk

    Re: [PATCH] Automatic block validation

    double spending
  8. 08

    · BitcoinTalk

    Re: checkpointing the block chain

    double spending
  9. 09

    · BitcoinTalk

    Re: Need OP_BLOCKNUMBER to allow "time" limited transactions

    double spending
  10. 10

    · BitcoinTalk

    Re: Fees in BitDNS confusion

    double spending

Need every match? Open the searchable archive with the primary tag applied. For combined-tag coverage, use the exact selection rule recorded above.

Three pointers into the full record.

Each preview is an existing archive excerpt of no more than 18 words from a separate source record. Complete wording stays at the linked archive.

  1. · bitcoin-list

    Release notes for Bitcoin v0.1 Alpha Bitcoin is a new electronic cash system that uses a peer-to-peer network…
    Read the complete record in context ↗
  2. · BitcoinTalk

    It looks like we overtook the bad chain somewhere around 74689. 0.3.9 and lower nodes have been responding…
    Read the complete record in context ↗
  3. · BitcoinTalk

    Not locktime. There's a possible design for far in the future: You intentionally write a double-spend. You write…
    Read the complete record in context ↗

Exact tags, documented era, pinned bytes.

The network-free builder verifies correspondence dataset v1.0.0 by SHA-256, includes only records marked documented-project-era, and matches exact labels in each record’s topics array. The disputed 2014 account message is excluded. Topic labels were created for discovery from subjects, normalized source text and linked quotation categories; they are not human-authored abstracts.

When citing a statement, cite the linked original or archival record—not this guide’s count alone. Source rights remain with their respective holders; this page adds original organization, statistics and limited excerpts.