On-chain record · high source confidence
Dormant Bitcoin Addresses: Nine On-Chain Records
This comparative dossier brings nine previously separate address profiles into one evidence record. Together they show why “dormant” is an observation about outgoing transactions, not a claim about identity, key custody or whether coins are lost. Seven addresses had no recorded spent outputs at the 6 August 2026 snapshot; two had historic spending in 2010 followed by more than fifteen years without another outgoing transaction. The nine snapshot balances total approximately 177,416.29 BTC, but later unsolicited deposits or owner-initiated spends can change that figure.
- First seen
- February 2009
- Connected
- March 2009
- Route display ID
1°-2D7D-B4F0Display identifier only — not proof of ownership.
2 additional population comparisons
Comparative evidence
Nine large dormant Bitcoin address records
The records use address-level funded and spent output totals. They are compared without clustering the addresses together or suggesting common control. Figures are a dated chain-data snapshot from 6 August 2026; later unsolicited deposits or owner-initiated spends can change them.
198aMn6ZYAczwrE5NvNTUMyJ5qkfy4g3Hi
- First received
- 22 February 2009 · block 5,219
- Funded outputs
- 386
- Total received
- 8,000.01 BTC
- Total spent
- 0 BTC
- Snapshot balance
- 8,000.01 BTC
- Outgoing record
- No spent outputs recorded
The 2009 date was checked directly on-chain. It is not evidence of ownership or of a connection to a named early miner.
1HLvaTs3zR3oev9ya7Pzp3GB9Gqfg6XYJT
- First received
- 18 March 2010
- Funded outputs
- 124
- Total received
- 9,260.02 BTC
- Total spent
- 0 BTC
- Snapshot balance
- 9,260.02 BTC
- Outgoing record
- No spent outputs recorded
The early date does not imply a relationship to early mining, Satoshi Nakamoto or another named participant.
12tkqA9xSoowkzoERHMWNKsTey55YEBqkv
- First received
- 5 April 2010
- Funded outputs
- 224
- Total received
- 28,151.06 BTC
- Total spent
- 0 BTC
- Snapshot balance
- 28,151.06 BTC
- Outgoing record
- No spent outputs recorded
An anonymous third-party cluster identifier is not an ownership label; no named owner is established.
15Z5YJaaNSxeynvr6uW6jQZLwq3n1Hu6RX
- First received
- 10 April 2010
- Funded outputs
- 144
- Total received
- 14,288.19 BTC
- Total spent
- 6,347.12 BTC
- Snapshot balance
- 7,941.07 BTC
- Outgoing record
- 17 transactions; last 15 October 2010
This address spent historically. Dormant means only that no later outgoing transaction was found.
12ib7dApVFvg82TXKycWBNpN8kFyiAN1dr
- First received
- 13 May 2010
- Funded outputs
- More than 260
- Total received
- 52,700.08 BTC
- Total spent
- 21,700.00 BTC
- Snapshot balance
- 31,000.08 BTC
- Outgoing record
- 4 transactions; last 24 July 2010
This address spent historically. Public speculation about named owners is undocumented and is not repeated here.
1PeizMg76Cf96nUQrYg8xuoZWLQozU5zGW
- First received
- 24 July 2010
- Funded outputs
- 165
- Total received
- 19,414.43 BTC
- Total spent
- 0 BTC
- Snapshot balance
- 19,414.43 BTC
- Outgoing record
- No spent outputs recorded
Recent inbound dust can change a last-activity date without showing action by the key holder.
167ZWTT8n6s4ya8cGjqNNQjDwDGY31vmHg
- First received
- 9 August 2010
- Funded outputs
- 92
- Total received
- 8,999.01 BTC
- Total spent
- 0 BTC
- Snapshot balance
- 8,999.01 BTC
- Outgoing record
- No spent outputs recorded
The address has no documented owner; the chain record establishes activity, not identity.
1F34duy2eeMz5mSrvFepVzy7Y1rBsnAyWC
- First received
- 8 August 2011
- Funded outputs
- 141
- Total received
- 10,770.54 BTC
- Total spent
- 0 BTC
- Snapshot balance
- 10,770.54 BTC
- Outgoing record
- No spent outputs recorded
Dormancy was confirmed at the snapshot date and remains time-sensitive.
1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYpUnztiYzVfBEQeC
- First received
- 27 May 2014
- Funded outputs
- 261
- Total received
- 53,880.07 BTC
- Total spent
- 0 BTC
- Snapshot balance
- 53,880.07 BTC
- Outgoing record
- No spent outputs recorded
No evidence establishes whether the key is held, lost or controlled by an unidentified custodian.
Evidence boundary
What is — and is not — established
No owner is attributed to any address in this report. An early first-received date, a large balance, or a short transaction-graph route does not establish a relationship to Satoshi Nakamoto, early mining, an exchange or any named person. “Never spent” describes the recorded outputs at the snapshot date; it does not prove that a key is lost, inaccessible or still controlled.
Inbound dust and message-carrying transactions are third-party activity and must not be treated as activity by a holder. For 12ib7d…AN1dr and 15Z5YJaa…1Hu6RX, dormancy means no recent outgoing transaction rather than no spending ever. Chain-history checks found four outgoing transactions from the first, last on 24 July 2010, and 17 from the second, last on 15 October 2010. The first receipt for 198aMn6Z…y4g3Hi was independently located at block 5,219 on 22 February 2009; that date still does not support an ownership attribution.
The dossier
Evidence record
Address record
- Role
- early accumulation address with no recorded spent outputs
- Script
- P2PKH
- Category
- Dormant wallet
- Source confidence
- high
- Catalog reviewed
- 2026-08-06
View all 9 documented addresses
- 01
198aMn6ZYAczwrE5NvNTUMyJ5qkfy4g3Hi - 02
1HLvaTs3zR3oev9ya7Pzp3GB9Gqfg6XYJT - 03
12tkqA9xSoowkzoERHMWNKsTey55YEBqkv - 04
15Z5YJaaNSxeynvr6uW6jQZLwq3n1Hu6RX - 05
12ib7dApVFvg82TXKycWBNpN8kFyiAN1dr - 06
1PeizMg76Cf96nUQrYg8xuoZWLQozU5zGW - 07
167ZWTT8n6s4ya8cGjqNNQjDwDGY31vmHg - 08
1F34duy2eeMz5mSrvFepVzy7Y1rBsnAyWC - 09
1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYpUnztiYzVfBEQeC
Source ledger
10 cited- bitinfocharts.com/top-100-do…s.html
- mempool.space/…/198aMn6ZYA…y4g3Hi
- mempool.space/…/1HLvaTs3zR…g6XYJT
- mempool.space/…/12tkqA9xSo…YEBqkv
- mempool.space/…/15Z5YJaaNS…1Hu6RX
- mempool.space/…/12ib7dApVF…iAN1dr
- mempool.space/…/1PeizMg76C…zU5zGW
- mempool.space/…/167ZWTT8n6…31vmHg
- mempool.space/…/1F34duy2ee…snAyWC
- mempool.space/…/1LdRcdxfbS…fBEQeC